Questions to consider for evaluating proprietary investment options
Should we use our recordkeeper’s investments (proprietary funds) or third-party funds? It’s a question retirement plan fiduciaries face when building or making changes to their plan’s investment lineup. Consider these three questions to help you objectively assess your recordkeeper’s proprietary options.
1 Does the proprietary fund meet your plan’s investment criteria?
Investment decisions should be based on a prudent selection process, not labels. What does this mean? Your retirement plan committee should use the same documented guidelines to evaluate all investments—whether they’re from your recordkeeper or a third party. These guidelines are typically set forth in an investment policy statement and may include:
- Investment objectives
- Risk/return characteristics
- Investment fees
- Long-term performance
Any fund that passes your screening process could be further considered for inclusion in your plan’s investment lineup. And remember, it’s not an all-or-none decision. You could consider offering a mix of proprietary and nonproprietary investments. In fact, on average, proprietary funds make up 33% of a plan’s total lineup.1
2 Is the proprietary fund in the best interest of participants?
As plan fiduciaries, you and the other committee members must avoid conflicts of interest when selecting investments for the plan. One possible conflict could be special pricing offered by your recordkeeper for including their investment funds in your plan. Although there’s nothing wrong with receiving a price break, you shouldn't pick a fund solely because of the money you’ll save. And that’s true for both proprietary and third-party investments.
3 Are the investment fees reasonable?
You also have a fiduciary duty to make sure investment fees are reasonable—something that, unfortunately, ERISA hasn’t defined. That said, the U.S. Department of Labor has clearly stated that reasonable doesn’t necessarily mean the lowest cost. In certain cases, an investment with higher fees could be the better option for your plan. Essentially, you want to make sure your participants aren’t overpaying for the value they’re receiving. And once again, this standard isn’t unique to proprietary funds—it applies to all 401(k) investments.
Here are a few things to consider to help you assess the reasonableness of investment fees:
- How do the fees compare with similar funds that meet your investment criteria?
- Does the fund offer a different share class with lower expenses?
- Do the fund’s expenses include revenue sharing? Some share classes have higher expenses because they share revenue with plan sponsors to help offset plan costs.
- If so, how does the revenue sharing affect participants’ net investment fees? Is any portion refunded to participants?
Be sure to include your plan’s financial professional in all your investment conversations. They can help you evaluate and benchmark different options and guide your decision-making. And as always, clearly document all your decisions and the process you used to reach them to help show that you acted prudently.
It boils down to this: can the fund stand on its own merits?
So what makes an investment suitable or not for your plan? In part, it’s your responses to these three questions:
1 Does it meet the plan’s investment criteria?
2 Is it in the participants’ best interests?
3 Are the investment fees reasonable?
A “yes” to all three questions means the investment may be a good fit, whether it’s a third-party fund or one that your recordkeeper offers. What really matters is that based on your objective analysis, you believe the option is the best choice to help your participants reach their retirement goals.
Important disclosures
This piece is not intended to be an exhaustive review of fiduciary duties under ERISA. The objective is to highlight the key responsibilities of a plan fiduciary and present the challenges that plan fiduciaries may face in discharging their duties. John Hancock is not in a position to provide legal advice concerning your plan or your role as plan fiduciary, and the information included should not be taken as such. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, please consult your legal counsel.
The content of this document is for general information only and is believed to be accurate and reliable as of the posting date, but may be subject to change. It is not intended to provide investment, tax, plan design, or legal advice (unless otherwise indicated). Please consult your own independent advisor as to any investment, tax, or legal statements made herein.
John Hancock Retirement Plan Services LLC offers administrative and/or recordkeeping services to sponsors and administrators of retirement plans. John Hancock Trust Company LLC provides trust and custodial services to such plans. Group annuity contracts and recordkeeping agreements are issued by John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.), Boston, MA (not licensed in NY), and John Hancock Life Insurance Company of New York, Valhalla, NY. Product features and availability may differ by state. Securities are offered through John Hancock Distributors LLC, member FINRA, SIPC.
John Hancock Investment Management Distributors LLC is the principal underwriter and wholesale distribution broker-dealer for the John Hancock mutual funds, member FINRA, SIPC.
MGS459797-P-GE 07/23 459759 MGR0710232981104